From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spikin v. City of Plano

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Dec 28, 2011
Case No. 4:11-CV-598 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:11-CV-598

12-28-2011

MICHELLE LUCILLE SPIKIN v. CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS and PAUL MALCOM, Individually and in his Official Capacity


Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 29, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #11) be granted.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #11) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice.

It is SO ORDERED.

____________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Spikin v. City of Plano

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Dec 28, 2011
Case No. 4:11-CV-598 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Spikin v. City of Plano

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE LUCILLE SPIKIN v. CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS and PAUL MALCOM…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:11-CV-598 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2011)