From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiker v. Diversified Collection Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-4298-JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 11-4298-JSC

11-08-2011

RACHEL SPIKER, Plaintiff, v. DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES. INC.; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.

KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Law Corporation June D. Coleman Danielle R. Teeters Attorneys for Defendant DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. CONSUMER LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT STEMPEER APLC LARA SHAPIRO Attorney for Plaintiff RACHEL SPIKER.


JUNE D. COLEMAN, CSBN 191890

DANIELLE R. TEETERS, CSBN 210056

KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD

Attorneys for Defendant

DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO

RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY

NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3)

Complaint served: 08/30/2011

Current response date: 10/21/2011

New response date: 11/07/2011

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff RACHEL SPIKER and Defendant DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES. INC., through and by their respective counsel of record herein, that DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES. INC. has an extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint in the above-entitled action up to and including November 7, 2011.

KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD

A Law Corporation

June D. Coleman

Danielle R. Teeters

Attorneys for Defendant

DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.

CONSUMER LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT STEMPEER

APLC

LARA SHAPIRO

Attorney for Plaintiff

RACHEL SPIKER.

Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Debbie Kick, declare:

1 am a citizen of the United States and employed in Sacramento County, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 400 Capitol Mall. 27th Floor, Sacramento. California 95814. On November 2, 2011, 1 served a copy of the within document(s):

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3)

[] by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m.

[] by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Sacramento, California addressed as set forth below.

[] by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed FEDEX envelope and affixing a pre-paid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to a FEDEX agent for delivery.

[] by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below.

[×] by transmitting via e-mail or electronic transmission the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) on file with the court's CM/ECF system.

I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. 1 am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

I declare that 1 am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made.

Executed on November 2, 2011. at Sacramento, California.

________________________________

Debbie Kick


Summaries of

Spiker v. Diversified Collection Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-4298-JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Spiker v. Diversified Collection Servs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL SPIKER, Plaintiff, v. DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES. INC.; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 11-4298-JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)