Spigner v. Barron

Full title: CHARLES SPIGNER, JR. a/k/a CHARLES J. SPIGNER, Petitioner, v. JOSE BARRON…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 31, 2006

Case No. 3:06cv227/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 31, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06cv227/LAC/EMT.

July 31, 2006

ORDER

LACEY COLLIER, District Judge

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated July 18, 2006. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made ade novo determination of objections filed.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and objections thereto, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 9) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and 28 U.S.C. § 2243.

DONE AND ORDERED.