From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiegelman v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The subject contracts of sale included mortgage contingency clauses. Although the purchasers secured loan commitments, the conditions of the purchasers' loan commitments were "not fulfilled through no fault of the purchasers" (Lunning v. 10 Bleecker St. Owners Corp., 160 A.D.2d 178; see, Cone v. Daus, 120 A.D.2d 788, 789-790), but, rather, as a result of the seller's lack of cooperation. Accordingly, the purchasers were properly granted summary judgment. The appellant's remaining contention does not warrant reversal. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spiegelman v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Spiegelman v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:AARON SPIEGELMAN et al., Respondents, v. S. MARTIN GORDON, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 851

Citing Cases

Goldport Properties v. Taylor

The record supports the determination of the Supreme Court that the defendant properly exercised his right to…

Chuang v. Quezada

The Court will also assume, for purposes of these motions, that Mr. Quezada is in breach of the Stipulation,…