From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiegel v. Cohen

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 4, 1946
186 Misc. 889 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)

Opinion

April 4, 1946.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, CURTIN, J.

Alfred E. Santangelo for appellants.

Louis J. Schwartz for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiff failed to establish his first cause of action. He was not licensed as an electrician in New York City nor did he prove that he was employed by and worked under the supervision of a licensed person, partnership or corporation (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B30-17.0). Plaintiff's proof as to the second cause of action was insufficient and failed to establish usury.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

SHIENTAG, McLAUGHLIN and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Spiegel v. Cohen

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 4, 1946
186 Misc. 889 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
Case details for

Spiegel v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Respondent, v. FAY COHEN et al., Copartners Trading under…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1946

Citations

186 Misc. 889 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
62 N.Y.S.2d 70

Citing Cases

Moglen v. Gasper

The jury found that there was such partnership and supervision, those issues of fact having been submitted to…

Gargano v. Smith

The courts are, nevertheless, judicious in applying that rule. Willful disregard of the licensing requirement…