From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiegel, Inc. v. United States

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Sep 27, 1951
116 F. Supp. 67 (D.D.C. 1951)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 2785-51.

September 27, 1951.

David G. Macdonald, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

John F. Baecher, E. Riggs McConnell, John H.D. Wigger, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., H.G. Morrison, Asst. to the Atty. Gen., James E. Kilday, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendant United States.

Daniel W. Knowlton, Chief Counsel, H.L. Underwood, Asst. Chief Counsel, C.H. Johns, Atty., Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C., for defendant Interstate Commerce Commission.

Roy C. Frank, Sol., Louis J. Doyle, Associate Sol., Paul Meninger, Atty., Post Office Department, Washington, D.C., for defendant Jesse M. Donaldson, Postmaster General.


The court concludes that it has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit since it is in effect a suit against the United States to which the United States has not consented; the complaint does not present a justiciable controversy over which the court has jurisdiction; the plaintiff has no standing to maintain the suit; the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., does not apply to proceedings of the Postmaster General in fixing parcel post rates.

The motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint is granted. It follows that all relief sought by plaintiff will be denied.

Counsel for defendants will submit appropriate orders consistent herewith.


Summaries of

Spiegel, Inc. v. United States

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Sep 27, 1951
116 F. Supp. 67 (D.D.C. 1951)
Case details for

Spiegel, Inc. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SPIEGEL, Inc., v. UNITED STATES et al

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Sep 27, 1951

Citations

116 F. Supp. 67 (D.D.C. 1951)

Citing Cases

Doehla Greeting Cards v. Summerfield

On these allegations, the plaintiffs are entitled to judicial review as to whether the Postmaster General has…