From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spicuzza v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 14, 1993
862 S.W.2d 390 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63035.

September 14, 1993.

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; JACK L. KOEHR, JUDGE.

Elizabeth Haines, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Spicuzza v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 14, 1993
862 S.W.2d 390 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Spicuzza v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SPICUZZA, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 14, 1993

Citations

862 S.W.2d 390 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)