From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spicer v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Feb 23, 2011
1:08CV747, 1:06CR299-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011)

Opinion

1:08CV747, 1:06CR299-1.

February 23, 2011


ORDER


On August 31, 2010, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed, and notice was served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court.

Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (Docket No. 154) be DENIED and that this action be dismissed. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.

February 22, 2011


Summaries of

Spicer v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Feb 23, 2011
1:08CV747, 1:06CR299-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Spicer v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:GLEN ALAN SPICER, Petitioner, pro se, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Feb 23, 2011

Citations

1:08CV747, 1:06CR299-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011)