From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spicer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 17, 2009
297 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED92565.

November 17, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Mark D. Seigel, Judge.

Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.



ORDER


Movant, Daman Spicer, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Spicer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 17, 2009
297 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Spicer v. State

Case Details

Full title:Daman SPICER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

297 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)