From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spicer v. Adelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2005
24 A.D.3d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2005-03600.

December 5, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 18, 2005, which granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to change the venue of this action from Kings County to Onondaga County or, in the alternative, to Westchester County to the extent of transferring the venue of this action to Westchester County.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries ( see CPLR 511 [d]).

The defendants failed to make the requisite showing for a change of venue based on the convenience of material witnesses ( see CPLR 510; O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169, 172-173). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants' motion to change the venue of this action.


Summaries of

Spicer v. Adelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2005
24 A.D.3d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Spicer v. Adelson

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA SPICER, Appellant, v. MARK D. ADELSON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
804 N.Y.S.2d 688

Citing Cases

Sidoti v. Mayerson Assoc

First, the motion was made only pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), but the court held that venue was improper in…

Markowitz v. Makura, Inc.

Therefore, upon renewal, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its prior determination denying the…