From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spicer-Henderson v. UCP of Miami, Inc.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Mar 15, 2017
No. 3D16-1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D16-1318

03-15-2017

Myrtle Spicer-Henderson, Appellant, v. UCP of Miami, Inc., Appellee.

Koch Parafinczuk & Wolf, P.A., and Marcus J. Susen and Justin R. Parafinczuk (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Kathryn L. Ender, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Lower Tribunal No. 14-7523 An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Marin, Judge. Koch Parafinczuk & Wolf, P.A., and Marcus J. Susen and Justin R. Parafinczuk (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Kathryn L. Ender, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. "Summary judgment is designed to test the sufficiency of the evidence to determine if there is sufficient evidence at issue to justify a trial or formal hearing on the issues raised in the pleadings." Menendez v. W. Gables Rehab. Hosp., LLC, 123 So. 3d 1178, 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (quoting The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006)).


Summaries of

Spicer-Henderson v. UCP of Miami, Inc.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Mar 15, 2017
No. 3D16-1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Spicer-Henderson v. UCP of Miami, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Myrtle Spicer-Henderson, Appellant, v. UCP of Miami, Inc., Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Mar 15, 2017

Citations

No. 3D16-1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2017)