From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spicehandler v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1951
279 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

December 10, 1951.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered when plaintiff fell from the sidewalk into the roadway, because of the presence of snow and ice on the sidewalk abutting premises owned by appellant, judgment was entered on a jury's verdict in favor of plaintiff against appellant. Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The facts are affirmed. There is no evidence that appellant created a condition on the sidewalk dangerous to pedestrians. The most the evidence shows is that appellant, although removing snow and ice from the sidewalk on several occasions following storms, in the period between the blizzard of December 26, 1947, and the date of the accident, February 7, 1948, failed to remove all snow and ice. ( Zysk v. City of New York, 300 N.Y. 507; Hendley v. Daw Drug Co., 293 N.Y. 790.) Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spicehandler v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1951
279 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Spicehandler v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:HANA SPICEHANDLER, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and WILLIAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Zwielich v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is…

Solomon v. Somerman

dismissed the complaint on the ground that no proof of actionable negligence had been adduced. In our…