Spiccia v. Paterson Silk Throwing Co., Inc.

Full title: CHRIS SPICCIA, RESPONDENT, v. PATERSON SILK THROWING CO., INC., APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 18, 1942

28 A.2d 120 (N.J. 1942)

129 N.J.L. 100

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1942 —

Decided September 18, 1942.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 127 N.J.L. 509.

For the respondent, Hymen D. Goldberg.

For the appellant, Herman Shapiro.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.