From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Speyer v. DeCicco Family Markets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 11, 2021
20 CIVIL 6478 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 6478 (PMH)

01-11-2021

JOSEPH SPEYER, Plaintiff, v. DECICCO FAMILY MARKETS, INC,. et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 11, 2021, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED. While "[d]istrict courts should frequently provide leave to amend before dismissing a pro se complaint... leave to amend is not necessary when it would be futile." Reed v. Friedman Mgt. Corp., 541 F. App'x 40, 41 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000)). Here, the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice as any amendment would be futile; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

January 11, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Speyer v. DeCicco Family Markets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 11, 2021
20 CIVIL 6478 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Speyer v. DeCicco Family Markets

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SPEYER, Plaintiff, v. DECICCO FAMILY MARKETS, INC,. et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 11, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 6478 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2021)