Opinion
Civil No. 95-0264 (JBS/AMD)
08-09-2012
CLAUS PETER SPETH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT GOODE, et al., Defendants.
HONORABLE JEROME B. SIMANDLE
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Docket Item 207] and Plaintiff's application under Rule 56(d) [Docket Item 214]; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties in support thereof and opposition thereto; for the reasons stated in the Opinion of today's date; and for good cause shown;
IT IS this 9th day of August, 2012 hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for deferral of the due date for Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further
ORDERED that, if the Magistrate Judge determines that Plaintiff is entitled to additional discovery upon the pending privilege motion [Docket Item 203], Plaintiff's opposition will be due fourteen (14) days after discovery is provided. However, if the Magistrate Judge denies additional discovery in the pending privilege motion, Plaintiff's opposition will be due fourteen (14) days after entry of the Magistrate Judge's decision; Plaintiff should be prepared to meet this deadline because no further extension will be granted.
____________
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge