From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sperry v. Maes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03171-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-03171-RPM

09-25-2012

TODD SPERRY and LINDA (Tetter) SPERRY, individually and as parents and guardians of J.S. and L.S., Plaintiffs, v. JASON T. MAES, GEORGE ELDER, and TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

Jonathan S. Willett


Eric M. Ziporin

Courtney B. Kramer


COURTROOM MINUTES

Hearing on Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order

10:00 a.m. Court in session.

Court's preliminary remarks. Counsel answer questions asked by the Court regrading discovery [80]. Mr. Ziporin states there was no formal classroom CIT training.

Court instructs Mr. Ziporin to check and produce emails (concerning Todd Sperry) as stated on record.

Depositions by specific written questions to officers, pursuant to Rule 31, is permitted regarding information concerning contacts within the relevant time period as stated on record.

Report and deposition of plaintiffs' credit expert is permitted and to be completed pursuant to the rules.

ORDERED: Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [80], is resolved as stated on record. Counsel have 60 days (November 24, 2012) to complete additional discovery permitted as stated on record. Oral motion to extend time for dispositive motions is denied.

10:40 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 40 min.


Summaries of

Sperry v. Maes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03171-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Sperry v. Maes

Case Details

Full title:TODD SPERRY and LINDA (Tetter) SPERRY, individually and as parents and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-03171-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 25, 2012)