From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sperow v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2016
Case No. LA CV 14-6913 DMG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 14-6913 DMG (JCG)

03-29-2016

GREGORY FRANK SPEROW, Petitioner, v. CHARLES WILLIAMS, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED THAT, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, the above-captioned action is DISMISSED as follows:

1. Petitioner's claim for prior custody credit - for time spent in custody between the Ninth Circuit's vacatur of his original Oregon sentence and the Oregon District Court's resentencing - is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. Petitioner's claims for "22 days of credit for overserved time" and "235 days of vested Good Conduct Time" are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DATED: March 29, 2016

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sperow v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2016
Case No. LA CV 14-6913 DMG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Sperow v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY FRANK SPEROW, Petitioner, v. CHARLES WILLIAMS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2016

Citations

Case No. LA CV 14-6913 DMG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)