From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spero Elec. Corp. v. Wilson

Appellate Court of Illinois
Mar 5, 1947
330 Ill. App. 622 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,101. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed March 5, 1947 Released for publication March 24, 1947

CONTRACTS, § 63shipping of goods pursuant to order specifying price for goods as acceptance of terms of order. Where defendant placed orders on basis of 52 per cent discount, after which plaintiff informed defendant that items ordered carried only 50 per cent discount, and defendant then wrote to plaintiff stating that if it did not wish to fill orders at discount of 52 per cent it should consider letter as cancellation of all unshipped items and asked acknowledgment of cancellation of same, shipment of goods by plaintiff after receipt of such advice constituted acceptance of orders as given, since defendant's letter did not constitute cancellation of contrct and necessary affirmative action required for cancellation was not taken by plaintiff.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Winnebago county; the Hon. WILLIAM R. DUSHER, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in this court at the October term, 1946.

Andrews, Essington Barrick, for appellant;

A.V. Essington, of counsel;

Large, Reno Zahm, for appellee;

Ralph S. Zahm, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed March 5, 1947; released for publication March 24, 1947.


Summaries of

Spero Elec. Corp. v. Wilson

Appellate Court of Illinois
Mar 5, 1947
330 Ill. App. 622 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Spero Elec. Corp. v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:Spero Electric Corporation, Appellant, v. P. H. Wilson, Trading as Forest…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Mar 5, 1947

Citations

330 Ill. App. 622 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
71 N.E.2d 827