From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Speonk Sand Gravel v. Town of Southampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1987
127 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

February 23, 1987

Appeal from the Town Board of the Town of Southampton.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The denial of the petitioner's application to substantially expand its mining operations, a nonconforming use since 1972 when the area was rezoned from an industrial classification to a residential one, was supported by substantial evidence and was a reasonable exercise of the Town Board's zoning authority (see, Town Law § 261). The petitioner failed to establish that its prior operations on the property north of Sunrise Highway in Speonk evidenced an "intent to appropriate the entire parcel" for such operations (cf., Matter of Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v Weise, 51 N.Y.2d 278, 286). Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Speonk Sand Gravel v. Town of Southampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1987
127 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Speonk Sand Gravel v. Town of Southampton

Case Details

Full title:SPEONK SAND GRAVEL CO., Petitioner, v. TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1987

Citations

127 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Buffalo Stone v. Cheektowaga

( Bingham v New York City Tr. Auth., 99 NY2d 355; Post v 120 E. End Ave. Corp., 62 NY2d 19; Matter of…

Buffalo Crushed v. Cheektowaga

Further, "[w]hile nonconforming uses are generally permitted to continue, they may not be enlarged as a…