From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spengler v. Pomona Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2020
Case No. CV 17-8665-DOC (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-8665-DOC (SP)

01-17-2020

MICHAEL R. SPENGLER, Plaintiff, v. POMONA POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted, but subsequent to the Report plaintiff did file a request to stay this case under Younger, consistent with the Report's recommendation. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff's Request to Stay under Younger (docket no. 27) is granted; (2) this case is stayed until the related state criminal case is no longer pending; and (3) the Court Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. Plaintiff is instructed that, if he wishes to continue with this case after disposition of the criminal charges against him, he must file a request that the stay be lifted and the case be re-opened within sixty (60) days of the final disposition of the criminal charges (including all appeals). DATED: January 17, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Spengler v. Pomona Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2020
Case No. CV 17-8665-DOC (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Spengler v. Pomona Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL R. SPENGLER, Plaintiff, v. POMONA POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2020

Citations

Case No. CV 17-8665-DOC (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2020)