From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Tifft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 25, 2013
3:12cv246/MCR/CJK (N.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2013)

Opinion

3:12cv246/MCR/CJK

01-25-2013

RANDY LAVERN SPENCER, Petitioner, v. R.P. TIFFT, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated January 14, 2013. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made (see doc. 59). Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petitioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (doc. 14) is DENIED.

____________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Spencer v. Tifft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 25, 2013
3:12cv246/MCR/CJK (N.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Spencer v. Tifft

Case Details

Full title:RANDY LAVERN SPENCER, Petitioner, v. R.P. TIFFT, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 25, 2013

Citations

3:12cv246/MCR/CJK (N.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2013)