From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 11, 2018
1:17-cv-00479-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2018)

Opinion

1:17-cv-00479-AWI-GSA-PC

06-11-2018

EDWARD B. SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. STUART SHERMAN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 13.) ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT STUART SHERMAN, ON PLAINTIFF'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT CLAIM, AND DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS

Edward B. Spencer ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 25, 2018, the court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this action proceed only against defendant Stuart Sherman on Plaintiff's claim for adverse conditions of confinement under the Eighth Amendment, and that all remaining claims be dismissed from this action. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within fourteen days. The fourteen-day deadline has expired, and Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 25, 2018, are ADOPTED in full;

2. This action now proceeds with Plaintiff's Complaint filed on April 4, 2017, against defendant Stuart Sherman on Plaintiff's claim for adverse conditions of confinement under the Eighth Amendment;

3. All remaining claims are DISMISSED from this action;

4. Plaintiff's state law claims for violation of health and sanitation standards and violation of the California Constitution are DISMISSED from this action based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and

5. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings, including initiation of service.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 11, 2018

/s/_________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Spencer v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 11, 2018
1:17-cv-00479-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Spencer v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD B. SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. STUART SHERMAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 11, 2018

Citations

1:17-cv-00479-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2018)