From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

March, 1935.

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that an issue of fact is presented as to whether the release set up in the motion papers was obtained by fraud and whether the whole sum of $300 was paid to the plaintiff so that he was required to tender the same to the defendant upon disaffirming the release. All concur, except Edgcomb and Lewis, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The order granted a dismissal of the complaint as to defendant Hunt in an automobile negligence action.)


Summaries of

Spencer v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Spencer v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SPENCER, Appellant, v. STACY R. HUNT, Respondent, and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)