From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Experian

United States District Court, District of Montana
Jun 24, 2024
No. CV-23-65-H-BMM (D. Mont. Jun. 24, 2024)

Opinion

CV-23-65-H-BMM

06-24-2024

HERU SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN, EQUIFAX, INC., RELX INC., TRANSUNION HOLDING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came before the Court for bench trial, hearing, or determination on the record. A decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge DeSoto's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 47) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

1. Spencer's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. No reasonable person could suppose an appeal would have merit.


Summaries of

Spencer v. Experian

United States District Court, District of Montana
Jun 24, 2024
No. CV-23-65-H-BMM (D. Mont. Jun. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Spencer v. Experian

Case Details

Full title:HERU SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN, EQUIFAX, INC., RELX INC., TRANSUNION…

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Jun 24, 2024

Citations

No. CV-23-65-H-BMM (D. Mont. Jun. 24, 2024)