From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Castro

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 22, 2009
No. CIV S-05-2456 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2456 GEB EFB P.

December 22, 2009


ORDER


On December 4, 2009, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's orders filed September 2, 2009 and November 10, 2009, denying his motions for appointment of counsel, for an evidentiary hearing, to expand the record, for release of his trial file, and to conduct discovery. Pursuant to Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the orders of the magistrate judge filed September 2, 2009 and November 10, 2009, are affirmed.


Summaries of

Spencer v. Castro

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 22, 2009
No. CIV S-05-2456 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Spencer v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:THURMAN LEROY SPENCER, Petitioner, v. ROY CASTRO, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2456 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)