From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Callajas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 21, 2013
Case No: 11-13107 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No: 11-13107

02-21-2013

WILLIAM SPENCER Plaintiff, v. ABIGAIL CALLAJAS, ET AL, Defendants.


Honorable Victoria A. Roberts


ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AND UPHOLDING ORDER

In this prisoner civil rights case, the Court referred several motions to Magistrate Judge Whalen for preparation of reports and recommendations:

1. Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. 21 and 24);
2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 31); and
3. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 28).

Those reports and recommendations are now before the Court with Plaintiff's objections.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court conducts a de novo review of any part of the Magistrate Judge's reports and recommendations to which there are proper objections. After careful review of the entire record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Whalen's reports and recommendations. They are thorough; they lay out the facts and procedural history of the case as well as the relevant case law. The Magistrate Judge provides reasoned explanations for his recommendations.

The Magistrate Judge also entered an order denying Plaintiff's motion to amend complaint (Doc. 38) . Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 41). This order is reviewed under a different standard: the Court must decide if it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A). After careful review, the Court decides the order is neither.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Whalen's Reports and Recommendations and UPHOLDS his Order:

(A) Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint, (Docs. 21, 24), are GRANTED;
(B) Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, (Doc. 31), is DENIED;
(C) Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, (Doc. 28), is DENIED; and
(D) Plaintiff's objection to the order denying his motion to amend the complaint, (Doc. 41), is DENIED.

Judgment will enter in favor of Defendants.

IT IS ORDERED.

_______________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record and William Spencer by electronic means or U.S. Mail on February 21, 2013.

Linda Vertriest

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Spencer v. Callajas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 21, 2013
Case No: 11-13107 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Spencer v. Callajas

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SPENCER Plaintiff, v. ABIGAIL CALLAJAS, ET AL, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

Case No: 11-13107 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 21, 2013)