From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spence v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Feb 10, 2006
Case No. 2:03-cv-02442-LKK-DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:03-cv-02442-LKK-DAD (PC).

February 10, 2006

BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES M. HUMES, Chief Assistant Attorney General, FRANCES T. GRUNDER, Senior Assistant Attorney General, MONICA N. ANDERSON, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, JODIE A. SCHWAB (SBN 223131), Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Fish, Harrison, Howard, Kelly, Templeton and Tuter.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS


Defendants' first request for an extension of time to serve their responses to Plaintiff's Second Request for Production of Documents was considered by this Court, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted twenty (20) days to and including March 2, 2006, to serve their responses to Plaintiff Spence's Second Request for Production of Documents.


Summaries of

Spence v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Feb 10, 2006
Case No. 2:03-cv-02442-LKK-DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Spence v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:GERALD SPENCE, Plaintiff, v. M.D. McDONALD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Feb 10, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:03-cv-02442-LKK-DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)