From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spence v. Balogh Company

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 25, 1963
317 F.2d 909 (D.C. Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 17399.

Argued March 13, 1963.

Decided April 25, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied May 28, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; William B. Jones, District Judge.

Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Alan L. Wurtzel, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Harold P. Green and Daniel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


This is a suit brought by plaintiff-appellant to require delivery of certain shares of stock, or, alternatively, to recover money damages. The facts are set out in the opinion of District Judge Jones. 216 F. Supp. 492 (1962). For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment of the District Court, dismissing the action on its merits after trial, will be

See also Spence v. Northern Virginia Doctors Hospital Corp., 202 Va. 478, 117 S.E.2d 657 (1961).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Spence v. Balogh Company

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 25, 1963
317 F.2d 909 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Spence v. Balogh Company

Case Details

Full title:William T. SPENCE, Appellant, v. BALOGH COMPANY, Inc., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Apr 25, 1963

Citations

317 F.2d 909 (D.C. Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

MacDonald v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Joslyn)

The issuer is the manufacturer of the securities; the members of the underwriting group are the wholesalers;…

Demarco v. Edens

We do not overlook the fact that in some cases it has indeed been said that a "best efforts" underwriting…