Opinion
August 3, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, the plaintiffs motion is denied, and the order dated June 27, 1996, is reinstated.
Because the plaintiff failed to establish both a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious claim, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting her motion to vacate her default in opposing the defendant's motion for summary judgment ( see, Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568; Rock v. Schwartz, 244 A.D.2d 542; Peterson v. Scandurra Trucking Co., 226 A.D.2d 691; Olivier v. Rosal-Arcillas, 204 A.D.2d 701; CPLR 5015, 2005 N.Y.C.P.L.R.; cf., Long Is. Sav. Bank v. Sutphen, 222 A.D.2d 660; McMahon v. City of New York, 105 A.D.2d 101).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.
Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.