From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spellmeyer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 29, 2019
586 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 82151

10-29-2019

Derrell D. SPELLMEYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Carol D. Jansen, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Carol D. Jansen, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division One: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Derrell Spellmeyer appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief, and argues that the motion court clearly erred when it denied Spellmeyer's claim that trial counsel was ineffective for unreasonably failing to present mitigation evidence at Spellmeyer's sentencing proceeding. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Spellmeyer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 29, 2019
586 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Spellmeyer v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derrell D. SPELLMEYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

586 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)