From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jun 17, 2010
No. 09-10-00224-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-10-00224-CR

Order Entered June 17, 2010.

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 95275.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


ORDER


On June 14, 2010, appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief which urges this Court to review this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel certified that a copy of the brief has been furnished to the appellant. Appellant's attorney also provided appellant with a copy of the reporter's record and notified appellant of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief. Counsel also filed a motion on behalf of his client for an extension of time to file a pro se brief.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, Dustin Spell, be given 60 days from the date hereof to file a pro se brief. It is, further, ORDERED that the State may file a reply brief, due 30 days from the date appellant files his brief, or if no brief is filed by appellant, 70 days from the date hereof.


Summaries of

Spell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jun 17, 2010
No. 09-10-00224-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Spell v. State

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN SPELL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jun 17, 2010

Citations

No. 09-10-00224-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 17, 2010)