From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Speiser v. U.S. Bank

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Feb 17, 2011
NO.: 3:10-CV-98 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2011)

Opinion

NO.: 3:10-CV-98.

February 17, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") filed by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley on January 27, 2011 [Doc. 35]. There have been no timely objections to the R R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

After careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Shirley's recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. The Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 35] and hereby DENIES plaintiff's motion/application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis [Doc. 32] and ORDERS that, if plaintiff intends to pursue his appeal, he must pay the full appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a supporting affidavit in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit within thirty (30) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Speiser v. U.S. Bank

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Feb 17, 2011
NO.: 3:10-CV-98 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Speiser v. U.S. Bank

Case Details

Full title:KARL M. SPEISER, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. U.S. BANK, agent of…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Feb 17, 2011

Citations

NO.: 3:10-CV-98 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2011)