From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2014
No. C 07-3602 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2014)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

ruling that in view of the indemnification obligations the manufacturer owed to its customer, the manufacturer was in privity with the customer such that claim preclusion could apply

Summary of this case from Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp.
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

No. C 07-3602 PJH

05-06-2014

SPEEDTRACK, INC., Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., et al., Defendants.

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

JUDGMENT

The court having granted defendants' motion for summary judgment,

it is Ordered and Adjudged

that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Office Depot, Inc., CDW Corporation, Newegg Inc., and PC Connection, Inc., and against plaintiff SpeedTrack, Inc., on the claims asserted against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Summaries of

SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2014
No. C 07-3602 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2014)

ruling that in view of the indemnification obligations the manufacturer owed to its customer, the manufacturer was in privity with the customer such that claim preclusion could apply

Summary of this case from Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp.

In SpeedTrack, the court found that the defendant-customers were in privity with the supplier of software for managing defendants' websites, and thus the customer-defendants could assert res judicata defensively against SpeedTrack based on the software supplier's previous non-infringement judgment.

Summary of this case from In re Personalweb Techs., LLC et al. Patent Litig.

In Office Depot, the court held on summary judgment that Wal-Mart did not prevent SpeedTrack from asserting claims under the doctrine of equivalents, because defendants were unable to show the claims were actually litigated.

Summary of this case from Speedtrack, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
Case details for

SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SPEEDTRACK, INC., Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 6, 2014

Citations

No. C 07-3602 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp.

Taylor , 553 U.S. at 894, 128 S.Ct. 2161. For example, as this court has observed, nonparty preclusion is…

Ultra-Mek, Inc. v. United Furniture Indus.

Plaintiff relies heavily on a case from the Northern District of California, in which a court found that…

6 Citing Cases