From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Speed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 9, 2000
764 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D00-1405

Opinion filed August 9, 2000 JULY TERM 2000

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter M. Weinstein, Judge; L.T. No. 97-970CF10A.

Ronald Speed, Avon Park, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Steven R. Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Sua sponte the court withdraws its opinion of July 5, 2000, and enters the following in its place.

We review the order of the trial court denying appellant's motion for post-conviction relief alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

The Supreme Court of Florida recently held that the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guideline provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced on October 1, 1995, and ended on May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S429 (Fla. Jun. 1, 2000). We agree with Judge Altenbernd's analysis in Smith v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1273 (Fla. 2d DCA May 24, 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the appellant's sentences under the 1994 guidelines scoresheet.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying 3.850 relief and remand for consideration of whether resentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000), revised by, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S359 (Fla. May 4, 2000).

WARNER, C.J., GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Speed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 9, 2000
764 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Speed v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SPEED, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 9, 2000

Citations

764 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Simeton v. State

On remand, the trial court shall determine whether resentencing is required. If the trial court determines…

Nealy v. State

On remand, the trial court shall determine whether resentencing is required. If the trial court determines…