From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Speck v. Bates

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 13, 2017
2016-1879 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1879

02-13-2017

ULRICH SPECK, Appellant v. BRIAN L. BATES, ANTHONY O. RAGHEB, JOSEPH M. STEWART, IV, WILLIAM J. BOURDEAU, BRIAN D. CHOULES, JAMES D. PURDY, NEAL E. FEARNOT, Appellees

BRYAN PATRICK COLLINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA, ROBERT M. FUHRER. CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellees. Also represented by WILLIAM ALEX MCKENNA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,044.

JUDGMENT

BRYAN PATRICK COLLINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA, ROBERT M. FUHRER. CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellees. Also represented by WILLIAM ALEX MCKENNA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 13, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Speck v. Bates

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 13, 2017
2016-1879 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Speck v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:ULRICH SPECK, Appellant v. BRIAN L. BATES, ANTHONY O. RAGHEB, JOSEPH M…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 2017

Citations

2016-1879 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)