From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spears v. El Dorado Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 15, 2021
No. 2:15-cv-0165 MCE AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-cv-0165 MCE AC PS

06-15-2021

BRIAN SPEARS, Plaintiff, v. EL DORADO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Brian Spears (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983, which challenges conditions of Plaintiff's confinement at the El Dorado County Jail while a pretrial detainee. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On January 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations regarding Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 33), which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service. Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 38. On January 10, 2021, the magistrate judge granted a 30-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file objections to the findings and recommendations, warning Plaintiff that further extensions would require a showing of exigent circumstances. ECF No. 41 (allowing Plaintiff until February 3, 2021). Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations on March 15, 2021. ECF No. 43.

Thus, Plaintiffs Objections are untimely. However, as part of this Court's inherent power, it retains the discretion to review such objections de novo. See Webb v. Califano, 468 F.Supp. 825, 830-31 (E.D. Cal. 1979). In preference of resolving such matters on the merits, the Court elects to consider Plaintiffs Objections in full. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1).

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the January 4, 2021, findings and recommendations (ECF No. 38) to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 4, 2021 (ECF No. 38), are ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. Plaintiffs Claims Three, Eight and Ten are DISMISSED without further leave to amend.
3. This case shall proceed on Plaintiffs remaining claims. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spears v. El Dorado Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 15, 2021
No. 2:15-cv-0165 MCE AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Spears v. El Dorado Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN SPEARS, Plaintiff, v. EL DORADO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-0165 MCE AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)