From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spearman v. Varano

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-2429 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-2429.

November 3, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2010, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and respondent having suggested that the matter be stayed pending the disposition of petitioner's Post Conviction Relief Act appeal (Doc. 11, at 5), and it appearing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has denied the petition for appellate review (Doc. 12, at 2), it is it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Respondents shall file, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, an answer, in the form of a brief, to the petition (Doc. 1). See R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 1(b), 5(b)-(d) (explaining required contents of answer and supporting materials).
2. Petitioner shall be permitted to file, within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the answer is filed, a reply to the answer. See R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 1(b), 5(e).
3. The court will decide whether to hold a hearing on the basis of the petition, respondents' answer, and, if filed, petitioner's reply.


Summaries of

Spearman v. Varano

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-2429 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Spearman v. Varano

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD SPEARMAN. Petitioner v. DAVID A. VARANO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 3, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-2429 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2010)