From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spearman v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 11, 2013
2013-3053 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

2013-3053

03-11-2013

AVON JARRETT SPEARMAN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC0752120306-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Treasury moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent, and for a 21-day extension of time for the Board to file its response brief.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Spearman's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s21


Summaries of

Spearman v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 11, 2013
2013-3053 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Spearman v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:AVON JARRETT SPEARMAN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

2013-3053 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2013)