From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spear v. Auto Dealers Discount Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 15, 1935
154 Misc. 801 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)

Opinion

March 15, 1935.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Weinshenker Weinshenker, for the appellant.

Pariser Pariser, for the respondent.


It was error to permit evidence of value of the automobile at the date of seizure. The value referred to in section 1120 of the Civil Practice Act means the value at the time of the trial and not at the time of seizure. ( N.Y. Yellow Cab Co. S.A., Inc., v. Courtlandt Garage Realty Corp., 223 A.D. 44.) The successful party is also entitled to recover damages for the loss of use of a chattel which has a usable value such as a pleasure automobile. ( Rapp v. Mabbet Motor Car Co., Inc., 201 A.D. 283.) The damages, whether arising out of loss of the use or depreciation, are embraced in the award for the detention of the property. ( Brewster v. Silliman, 38 N.Y. 423.)

Judgment and order reversed, with twenty dollars costs, and the cause is remitted to the lower court to assess the damages in accordance with these instructions.

All concur; present, LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Spear v. Auto Dealers Discount Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 15, 1935
154 Misc. 801 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)
Case details for

Spear v. Auto Dealers Discount Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ANN SPEAR, Respondent, v. AUTO DEALERS DISCOUNT CORPORATION, Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1935

Citations

154 Misc. 801 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)
278 N.Y.S. 561

Citing Cases

Stengel v. Black

See Satterwhite v. Harriman Nat. Bank Trust Co., 13 F. Supp. 493, 499 (S.D.N.Y. 1935). For these purposes,…

Franjo Transp., Inc. v. B K Fleet Serv

The court found that there was insufficient evidence as to the value of the use of the trailer. It is well…