From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spear, Leeds Kellogg v. Central Life Assurance

U.S.
Dec 16, 1996
519 U.S. 1040 (1996)

Summary

applying the Lemon test in a school-related Establishment Clause case, but "not[ing] that the critical factor" was the endorsement test

Summary of this case from Altman v. Bedford Cent. School Dist.

Opinion

No. 96-592.

December 16, 1996, OCTOBER TERM, 1996.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 85 F. 3d 21.


Summaries of

Spear, Leeds Kellogg v. Central Life Assurance

U.S.
Dec 16, 1996
519 U.S. 1040 (1996)

applying the Lemon test in a school-related Establishment Clause case, but "not[ing] that the critical factor" was the endorsement test

Summary of this case from Altman v. Bedford Cent. School Dist.

In Prince, in the context of confirming a chapter 11 reorganization plan which required the debtor to pay creditors the equity value of his orthodontist practice, the court determined that the equity value of the stock had to include the corporation's goodwill and going concern value and rejected all of the debtor's arguments to the contrary.

Summary of this case from In re Schultz
Case details for

Spear, Leeds Kellogg v. Central Life Assurance

Case Details

Full title:SPEAR, LEEDS KELLOGG v. CENTRAL LIFE ASSURANCE CO. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 16, 1996

Citations

519 U.S. 1040 (1996)

Citing Cases

In re Schultz

This exclusion applies in Chapter 7 cases. See In re Prince, 85 F.3d 314, 321 (7th Cir. 1996), rehearing en…

In re McLaren

"Good faith" is neither defined in the Code nor the legislative history to § 548(c). Jobin v. McKay (In re M…