From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spaude v. Comm'n on Ethics

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Dec 30, 2022
No. 5D22-322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2022)

Opinion

5D22-322

12-30-2022

WILLIAM SPAUDE, Appellant, v. COMMISSION ON ETHICS, Appellee.

E. Dylan Rivers, and Kevin A. Forsthoefel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Melody A. Hadley, Advocate for the Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee, and Steven J. Zuilkowski, and Grayden P. Schafer, and Suhail Chhabra, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Administrative Appeal from the Commission on Ethics. LT Case Nos. 19-174 21-2145EC 22-001

E. Dylan Rivers, and Kevin A. Forsthoefel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Melody A. Hadley, Advocate for the Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee, and Steven J. Zuilkowski, and Grayden P. Schafer, and Suhail Chhabra, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

William Spaude, Mayor of the City of Bushnell, appeals the Final Order of the Florida Commission on Ethics which determined that he violated section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes (2022). Spaude argues that the Commission failed to establish by clear and convincing proof that he acted corruptly as defined by sections 112.313 and 112.312(9). We agree that neither the facts nor the law support a finding that Spaude acted corruptly as that term is defined.

Accordingly, we reverse and quash the Commission's final order. Based on this ruling, we do not reach Spaude's remaining argument regarding the lack of proportionality of the penalty imposed to the violations found.

REVERSED. ORDER QUASHED.

EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

EISNAUGLE, J., dissents, with opinion.

EISNAUGLE, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent because I conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that Mayor Spaude acted "corruptly." Here, while the benefit obtained was arguably small, a reasonable finder of fact could conclude that Spaude acted "with a wrongful intent and for the purpose of obtaining . . . a[] benefit resulting from [the] act . . . which is inconsistent with the proper performance of [Spaude's] public duties." § 112.312(9), Fla. Stat. (2022).


Summaries of

Spaude v. Comm'n on Ethics

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Dec 30, 2022
No. 5D22-322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Spaude v. Comm'n on Ethics

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SPAUDE, Appellant, v. COMMISSION ON ETHICS, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 30, 2022

Citations

No. 5D22-322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2022)