From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spatz Furniture v. Lee Letter Serv

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 22, 1967
54 Misc. 2d 359 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)

Opinion

June 22, 1967

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, PATRICK J. PICARIELLO, J.

Edward Perlstein and Paul Klein for appellant.

Max Glassman for respondent.


The withholding of 10% of an employee's income by an employer for the benefit of a judgment creditor is mandated by CPLR 5231 (subd. [e]). An employer may not turn over to the Marshal less than 10% of the income due to the judgment debtor, to the detriment of a second income execution, which was duly served and filed with him.

However, a judgment debtor may move to reduce the percentage (CPLR 5231, subd. [g]) or the employer may protect itself by moving for an order of modification (CPLR 5240).

The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., GOLD and MARKOWITZ, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

Spatz Furniture v. Lee Letter Serv

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 22, 1967
54 Misc. 2d 359 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)
Case details for

Spatz Furniture v. Lee Letter Serv

Case Details

Full title:SPATZ FURNITURE CORP., Respondent, v. LEE LETTER SERVICE, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1967

Citations

54 Misc. 2d 359 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)
282 N.Y.S.2d 624

Citing Cases

Vista Sales Corp. v. Briggsford Corp.

Though respondent may not have intended to waive the defective service, the court cannot concern itself with…

County Trust Co. v. Berg

Subdivision (g) permits the court, in the interest of justice, and in its discretion, to reduce an income…