From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spatafora v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 21, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

EPTL 5-4.1 provides that a decedent's personal representative must commence an action to recover damages for wrongful death "within two years after the decedent's death". The plaintiffs' decedent died on October 30, 1988, and the plaintiffs served the summons and complaint on all but one of the defendants on April 16, 1991, and served the final defendant on April 22, 1991, some two-and-a-half years later. The plaintiffs' cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death was therefore properly dismissed as to all defendants (see, e.g., Collins v. Jamaica Hosp., 158 A.D.2d 649, 650; Maldonado v. Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 156 A.D.2d 431).

All of the defendants were sued in their capacities as medical professionals, on the theory that they failed to properly perform, read and interpret cardiac tests. Because the incompetence alleged is of a specialized medical nature, deriving from the physician-patient relationship, and substantially related to medical diagnosis and treatment, the action it gives rise to is by definition one for medical malpractice rather than for simple negligence (see, e.g., McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear Throat Hosp., 15 N.Y.2d 20, 24; Borrillo v. Beekman Downtown Hosp., 146 A.D.2d 734, 735; Papa v. Brunswick Gen. Hosp., 132 A.D.2d 601, 603). The applicable Statute of Limitations is therefore the two-and-a-half years provided by CPLR 214-a rather than the three-year period governing simple negligence claims. Service was effected upon all defendants except St. John's Episcopal Hospital more than two-and-a-half years after the date each last treated the plaintiffs' decedent, with the result that plaintiffs' medical malpractice cause of action as to the individual defendants was time-barred.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O'Brien, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spatafora v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Spatafora v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital

Case Details

Full title:HOLLY M. SPATAFORA et al., Appellants, v. ST. JOHN'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 118

Citing Cases

Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center

Camposano v. Claiborn, 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 135, 136-37, 196 A.2d 129 (1963). From those definitions, we conclude…

Stankiewicz v. Institute of Living

Camposano v. Claiborn, 2 Conn. Cir.Ct. 135, 136-37, 196 A.2d 129 (1963). From those definitions, we conclude…