From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sparrow v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Salem
Jan 11, 1994
Record No. 2154-92-3 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 1994)

Opinion

Record No. 2154-92-3

January 11, 1994

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY KENNETH I. DEVORE, JUDGE.

Charles R. Beller III, for appellant.

Robert Q. Harris, Assistant Attorney General (Stephen D. Rosenthal, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Coleman and Willis.

Argued at Salem, Virginia.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.


We hold that the defendant's stopping on the highway to avoid striking an animal under the circumstances of the case established, as a matter of law, an affirmative defense to the violation of Code § 46.2-888, "stop[ping] a vehicle in such [a] manner as to impede or render dangerous the use of the highway by others, except in the case of an emergency." When the undisputed evidence establishes an affirmative defense as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. Reed v. Commonwealth, 6 Va. App. 65, 72, 366 S.E.2d 274, 277 (1988).

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed.

Reversed and final judgment.


Summaries of

Sparrow v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Salem
Jan 11, 1994
Record No. 2154-92-3 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 1994)
Case details for

Sparrow v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK R. SPARROW, s/k/a PATRICK REAGAN SPARROW v. COMMONWEALTH OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia. Salem

Date published: Jan 11, 1994

Citations

Record No. 2154-92-3 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 1994)