From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sparrock v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 289 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

August 11, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Philip Sparrock tripped and fell on a stairway in a park adjacent to the Kings County Supreme Court building. Contrary to his contention, any intra-departmental work orders submitted by a supervisor with the New York City Department of Parks which noted that the steps at issue were in disrepair would not satisfy the notice requirement of the "Pothole Law" (Administrative Code of City of N.Y. § 7-201 [c]; see, Laing v. City of New York, 71 N.Y.2d 912). Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to establish that there was a manifest defect in the steps so as to put this case within the narrow exception to the rule requiring written notice ( see, Ferris v. County of Suffolk, 174 A.D.2d 70; Blake v. City of Albany, 63 A.D.2d 1075, affd 48 N.Y.2d 875). Since the plaintiffs failed to satisfy the statutory condition precedent to bringing an action against the City for injuries arising from a defective condition ( see, Katz v. City of New York, 87 N.Y.2d 241), the trial court properly precluded evidence regarding their claim of negligent maintenance.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sparrock v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 289 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Sparrock v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP SPARROCK et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 11, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 289 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 47

Citing Cases

Perdomo v. Ramrikhi

As no constructive notice exception has been held to override the statutory requirement of prior written…

McCarthy v. White Plains

In response, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether there was such prior written…