From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sparks v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01897-RM-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01897-RM-MJW

07-25-2013

STEPHEN THENE SPARKS, Plaintiff, v. TEJINDER SINGH, Physician Assistant, LISA HANKS, Nurse, TED LAWRENCE, Physician Assistant, Acting Health Service Administrator, MICHAEL AASEN, MD, ROBBIE QUICK, Health Service Administrator, TOM CLEMENTS, C.D.O.C. Director, STEVE HARTLEY, Warden, and COLORADO HEALTH PARTNERS (C.H.P.), Defendants.


Judge Raymond P. Moore


ORDER ADOPTING

RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANT MICHAEL AASEN BE DISMISSED (ECF NO. 54)

This matter is before the Court on the July 9, 2013 Recommendation that the Claims Against Defendant Michael Aasen be Dismissed ("Recommendation") (ECF No. 54) due to Plaintiff's failure to effect service on Defendant Aasen. The Recommendation advised the parties they had fourteen days after the service of the Recommendation to serve and file any written objections. The time permitted for any objections has expired and no objection to the Recommendation has been filed.

The Court has reviewed the record and is mindful that Plaintiff is a pro se party. The Court concludes the Magistrate Judge's analysis was thorough and sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) Advisory Committee's Notes ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) ("In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate."). It is therefore ORDERED:

1. That the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 54) is ADOPTED in its entirety as an order of this Court; and
2. That pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1 Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Michael Aasen are DISMISSED without prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

RAYMOND P. MOORE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sparks v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01897-RM-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Sparks v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN THENE SPARKS, Plaintiff, v. TEJINDER SINGH, Physician Assistant…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 25, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01897-RM-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 25, 2013)