From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sparks v. Fels

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Mar 18, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

238 CA 15-00753.

03-18-2016

Diane SPARKS, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Larry FELS, Jr., Schwan's Home Service, Inc., and Schwan's Food Service, Inc., Defendants–Respondents.

Campbell & Shelton, LLP, Eden, Magavern Magavern Grimm, LLP, Buffalo (Edward J. Markarian of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant. Hurwitz & Fine, P.C., Buffalo (Jody E. Briandi of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.


Campbell & Shelton, LLP, Eden, Magavern Magavern Grimm, LLP, Buffalo (Edward J. Markarian of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant.

Hurwitz & Fine, P.C., Buffalo (Jody E. Briandi of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:

In this action arising out of a motor vehicle accident, plaintiff appeals from that part of an order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiff's claim for punitive damages. “Punitive damages are warranted where the conduct of the party being held liable evidences a high degree of moral culpability, or where the conduct is so flagrant as to transcend mere carelessness, or where the conduct constitutes willful or wanton negligence or recklessness (Fernandez v. Suffolk County Water Auth., 276 A.D.2d 466, 467, 714 N.Y.S.2d 91 2000; Lee v. Health Force, 268 A.D.2d 564, 702 N.Y.S.2d 108 2000; Rey v. Park View Nursing Home, 262 A.D.2d 624, 627, 692 N.Y.S.2d 686 1999 )” (Buckholz v. Maple Garden Apts., LLC, 38 A.D.3d 584, 585, 832 N.Y.S.2d 255). In other words, “[p]unitive damages are available for the purpose of vindicating a public right only where the actions of the alleged tort-feasor constitute gross recklessness or intentional, wanton or malicious conduct aimed at the public generally or are activated by evil or reprehensible motives” (Pascazi v. Pelton, 210 A.D.2d 910, 621 N.Y.S.2d 979 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ross v. Louise Wise Servs., Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 478, 489, 836 N.Y.S.2d 509, 868 N.E.2d 189). Here, we conclude that the record does not evince circumstances warranting an award of punitive damages (see Cushing v. Seemann, 247 A.D.2d 891, 893, 668 N.Y.S.2d 791; see generally Green v. Passenger Bus Corp. [Appeal No. 2], 61 A.D.3d 1377, 1378, 877 N.Y.S.2d 577; Buckholz, 38 A.D.3d at 585, 832 N.Y.S.2d 255).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, NEMOYER, and CURRAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sparks v. Fels

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Mar 18, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Sparks v. Fels

Case Details

Full title:DIANE SPARKS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LARRY FELS, JR., SCHWAN'S HOME…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1981
26 N.Y.S.3d 920

Citing Cases

Pulizzi v. Jyoti Sai Hosp., LLC

ases where the wrong complained of is morally culpable, or is actuated by evil and reprehensible motives" (…

Libreros v. Gallo

In any event, the second affirmative defense denies the plaintiff's right to punitive damages on the ground…