From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spano v. Riley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 30, 1997

Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Supreme Court properly granted the motions of defendants to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) and properly denied plaintiff's motions for a change of venue and leave to amend the complaint. The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in enjoining plaintiff from instituting further actions or proceedings as a pro se litigant without obtaining prior judicial approval (see, Dubroff v. Norych Tallis, 220 A.D.2d 480, 481; Spremo v. Babchik, 216 A.D.2d 382, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 709, cert denied 616 U.S. 1161).


Summaries of

Spano v. Riley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Spano v. Riley

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD C. SPANO, as Administrator of the Estate of MARK A. SPANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)