From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spano v. Flatrate Moving Network, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 27, 2017
72 N.Y.S.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

No. 570537/17.

11-27-2017

Natalie SPANO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. FLATRATE MOVING NETWORK, LLC., Defendant–Appellant.


Order (Carol R. Sharpe, J.), dated March 21, 2017, affirmed, without costs.

Civil Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment, since the affidavit submitted in support of the motion was not notarized, and therefore none of the allegations therein could be considered (see John Harris P.C. v. Krauss, 87 AD3d 469 [2011] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

Spano v. Flatrate Moving Network, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 27, 2017
72 N.Y.S.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

Spano v. Flatrate Moving Network, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Natalie SPANO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. FLATRATE MOVING NETWORK, LLC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 27, 2017

Citations

72 N.Y.S.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)