From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spann v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 21, 2023
2:23-cv-00116-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00116-JAD-NJK

04-21-2023

DAYNA SPANN, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendants.


ORDER

NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-1(a). To the extent Defendant seeks to stay discovery pending resolution of its motion to dismiss, it must file a motion addressing the pertinent standards by April 28, 2023. See Kor Media Grp., LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D 579 (D. Nev. 2013). If a motion to stay discovery is filed by that date, discovery will be stayed on an interim basis pending resolution of that request. If a motion to stay discovery is not filed by that date, the parties must file a joint discovery plan by May 5, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spann v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 21, 2023
2:23-cv-00116-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Spann v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:DAYNA SPANN, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 21, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00116-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2023)